Certification guide
Informatica Data Quality 10: Administrator Specialist
Explore the certification, exam details, and preparation experiences shared by learners.
- Issuing authority
- Informatica
- Industry
- IT (Developer, Data, Architect)
- Certification price
- Not provided
- Validity
- Not provided
1901 recorded views
About this certification
The Informatica Data Quality 10: Administrator Specialist examination is for the students seeking certification as a Data Quality Administrator Certified Professional.
In general, the Informatica Data Quality 10: Administrator Specialist course measures a candidate's competency as a full member of a project implementation team, along with their ability to install, configure and administer the Informatica Data Quality (IDQ) Product (Client, Server, and Services).
Average Salary Range
USA: $67,200 (Source)
India: 5,25,000 INR (Source)
Benefits
1. Career Advancement: Informatica certifications are in huge demand in today’s world. This certification enhances your resumes and recognizes and differentiates you from your competitors by setting the bars high.
2. Monetary Benefits: Informatica Data Quality 10: Administrator Specialists’ have a higher pay scale than others in the same company.
Examination Topics
1. Address Validation (10%)
2. Connections (6%)
3. Data Director & Workflows (8%)
4. Domain Management, Users & Architecture DQ Content (9%)
5. DQ Content (4%)
6. DQ Matching (6%)
7. DQ Services (13%)
8. Installation & Upgrade (11%)
9. Monitoring & Log (14%)
10. Operations (9%)
11. Reporting (6%)
12. Security, Users & Architecture (4%)
Exam details
The candidate might practice for the exam by taking up the following practice courses:
1. Data Quality: Data Quality Management for Developers (On Demand OR Instructor Led)
2. Data Quality: Administration (On Demand OR Instructor Led)
For more information, log on to the official website.
Learn from the community
Preparation reviews (0)
No preparation reviews yet
There are no published preparation reviews for this certification.
Visit the discussion